House Small Business Chair Backs Bill To Curb Website Privacy Suits

Mark Paulson
African man closing a store with a sign in Portuguese, wearing an apron; CIPA lawsuits small business
Image credit: Photo by Pexels

Rep. Roger Williams, who chairs the House Committee on Small Business, is backing legislation aimed at a wave of lawsuits accusing website owners of illegal wiretapping over routine analytics tools and ad pixels, according to a Small Business Trends report from October 12, 2026. The Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits Act, introduced by Rep. Russ Fulcher of Idaho, would exclude ordinary commercial web technology from wiretap laws.

If you run a website, an online store, or a portfolio with Google Analytics or a Meta pixel installed, this is your fight too. Demand letters over tracking tools do not check how small you are before they arrive.

What The Bill And The Lawsuits Involve

The suits at issue are brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, known as CIPA. The report says more than 5,600 such cases have been filed, many over analytics and pixels, with statutory damages that can reach $5,000 per violation.

As one example, a Texas skincare company reportedly settled a cookie-based CIPA claim for $20,000. The report gives no bill number, committee referral, or vote schedule for the Fulcher measure, so it has a long road ahead before it could become law.

Why This Matters For Self-Employed Site Owners

A settlement of that size can equal months of income for a solo consultant or small shop. Even a claim that looks weak on paper can cost real money in legal fees, and many owners pay a modest settlement just to make the problem go away.

Williams put the stakes in plain terms, saying “Every dollar spent to fight one of these claims is a dollar that never makes it into a paycheck.” For a one-person business, that sentence is close to literal.

See also  Every Launches Benefits Platform Aimed At Small Employers

What Self-Employed Site Owners Should Do Next

Audit what your site actually loads. List every analytics tool, ad pixel, chat widget, and session-recording script, and remove the ones you do not use. Fewer trackers means fewer things a plaintiff’s lawyer can point to.

Then review your privacy policy and consent banner so they describe what you really collect, and ask a business attorney or your insurer whether your coverage handles privacy claims. If a demand letter arrives, do not ignore it or pay it on the spot, and get professional advice first. This is general information and not legal advice.

What To Watch Next

Watch for a bill number, a committee hearing, and any California action, since the report mentions a state bill aimed at one category of website-tracking suits. Federal movement on a measure like this often takes many months, if it happens at all.

In the meantime, legal exposure is a recurring theme for new owners, as our coverage of owners regretting they did not understand business insurance showed. Reviewing your coverage now costs far less than learning the gaps after a claim.

About Self Employed's Editorial Process

The Self Employed editorial policy is led by editor-in-chief, Renee Johnson. We take great pride in the quality of our content. Our writers create original, accurate, engaging content that is free of ethical concerns or conflicts. Our rigorous editorial process includes editing for accuracy, recency, and clarity.

TAGGED:
Hi, I am Mark. I am the in-house legal counsel for Self Employed. I oversee and review content related to self employment law and taxes. I do consulting for self employed entrepreneurs, looking to minimize tax expenses.