In the customer service world, we often assume that human interaction is always the gold standard. But I’ve come to realize this isn’t always true. There are many situations where customers actually prefer not to talk to a human representative—and forcing them to do so creates friction rather than satisfaction.
Let’s be clear: human-to-human interaction remains essential for complex, sensitive, or emotionally charged customer issues. These situations demand empathy, nuance, and the kind of adaptive thinking that AI still struggles to provide. When a customer is upset, confused, or dealing with a complicated problem, nothing replaces the reassurance of speaking with another person.
The Efficiency Advantage
However, for routine questions and simple requests, human interaction isn’t just unnecessary—it can be an obstacle to what customers truly want: speed, accuracy, and convenience. Many customers don’t actually want to talk to someone; they just want their issue resolved quickly.
Consider these scenarios where AI often creates a better experience:
- Checking account balances or transaction history
- Tracking order status or delivery times
- Resetting passwords or updating account information
- Finding basic product information or store hours
- Making simple reservations or appointments
In these cases, forcing customers to wait for a human representative creates unnecessary friction. An AI solution that provides immediate, accurate answers actually delivers superior service.
View this post on Instagram
Recognizing Customer Priorities
The key insight I’ve gained from working with companies across industries is that we need to recognize when customers value efficiency over engagement. This isn’t about cutting costs or reducing headcount—it’s about understanding what truly matters to customers in different service contexts.
When I help organizations design their customer experience strategy, I encourage them to ask: “What does the customer actually want in this specific interaction?” Often, what they want is the fastest path to resolution, not a conversation.
Just because a human could handle a task doesn’t mean they should.
This represents a fundamental shift in how we think about service excellence. The best service isn’t always the most high-touch—it’s the service that best matches customer expectations for that particular situation.
Finding the Right Balance
The challenge for businesses isn’t choosing between humans or AI—it’s determining the right tool for each job. This requires:
- Mapping customer journeys to identify where efficiency matters most
- Understanding emotional context in different types of interactions
- Creating seamless handoffs between AI and human agents when needed
Organizations that get this balance right can deliver both efficiency and empathy—using technology to handle routine matters while freeing human agents to focus on situations where they add the most value.
My research shows that customers are increasingly comfortable with AI handling simple matters. In fact, many prefer it, especially younger demographics who value speed and self-service options. The resistance often comes more from within organizations than from customers themselves.
We need to move past the false dichotomy that positions AI as impersonal and human service as superior. The reality is more nuanced. Sometimes the most personal service is the one that respects customers’ time and desire for convenience.
The future of exceptional customer experience isn’t about maximizing human touchpoints—it’s about optimizing each interaction to deliver what customers value most in that specific context. Sometimes that means a caring human conversation, and sometimes it means getting out of the customer’s way and letting technology provide the fastest path to resolution.
