Delaying Social Security May Backfire

Emily Lauderdale
delaying social security may backfire
delaying social security may backfire

Conventional wisdom says to wait until 70 to claim Social Security, but that choice is not always the winner. The timing can raise taxes, reduce lifetime income, and add risk if health falters. The issue looms for millions approaching retirement, as rising costs force hard choices on when to turn benefits on and how to fund the years in between.

I set out to examine when waiting helps and when it hurts. The answer depends on health, tax brackets, savings, and whether a spouse also depends on the benefit. A single sentence captured the tension best:

“Delaying Social Security until age 70 can seem smart, but experts warn it may cost you more than you gain depending on health, taxes and income.”

Why Timing Matters

Social Security grows with each month you wait past full retirement age, up to age 70. The increase is about 8% per year, according to the Social Security Administration. That growth is designed to be actuarially fair for the average person. But no one is average in health or taxes.

I often hear people frame this as a simple math choice. It is not. The break-even point for waiting can land in the late 70s or early 80s. If you do not expect to live that long, waiting can cut lifetime income. If you live well into your 90s, waiting often pays off.

Health and Longevity

Health is the first filter. If you have serious conditions or a family history of shorter lifespans, earlier claiming can protect lifetime cash flow. If you expect long life, waiting can insure against outliving savings.

See also  Trump Administration Moves To Expand Offshore Drilling

Couples face a special twist. A higher earner who waits raises the survivor benefit for a spouse. That makes waiting more attractive when one spouse is likely to outlive the other. Still, the decision should reflect current health, not only averages.

Taxes and Medicare Costs

Taxes can flip the result. Up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxable based on “provisional income.” Claiming early can push more of each dollar into taxation if you also work or draw IRA income. Waiting can also raise future taxes if a larger benefit combines with required IRA withdrawals.

Medicare adds another layer. Higher income can trigger premium surcharges known as IRMAA. A larger benefit at 70 may coincide with big required distributions in your 70s, pushing premiums higher. On the other hand, claiming earlier while converting some IRA funds to a Roth in low-tax years can lower lifetime taxes and future premiums.

Income Needs and Opportunity Cost

The money you spend while waiting matters. If you must drain savings or rack up debt to delay, the extra benefit at 70 may not make you whole. Market returns are uncertain. Spending down investments during a downturn to delay can harm future security.

I reviewed common case studies used by planners. In one, a 67-year-old drawing 5% from a volatile portfolio to wait until 70 risks selling low in a bear market. In another, a retiree with ample cash and strong health can bridge the gap with little strain. The same rule of thumb does not fit both.

What Advisors Recommend

Advisors often test several plans:

  • Claim now and reduce portfolio withdrawals.
  • Delay to 70 and spend cash or bonds to bridge.
  • Claim a smaller benefit early while working part-time.
See also  Mortgage Refinance Rates Report Released for Wednesday

I hear a common refrain: match the claim date to your tax plan. Some retirees claim earlier to keep taxable income steady and convert IRAs in low brackets. Others delay to 70 to maximize a survivor benefit and reduce sequence-of-returns risk late in life.

Key Questions to Ask

Before deciding, run the numbers and pressure-test them for surprises:

  • How is your health and family longevity?
  • What is your break-even age for waiting?
  • How will taxes, Roth conversions, and RMDs interact with each option?
  • Will a spouse rely on your benefit now or later?
  • What will you spend to bridge the gap, and from which accounts?

The simple advice to “always wait” falls short. The plan that wins on paper can lose in real life if taxes climb, markets dip, or health changes. The smarter approach is a personalized claim strategy that fits your health, tax path, and cash needs.

For now, the takeaway is clear. Waiting can help, but not for everyone. Run a detailed projection, stress-test taxes and premiums, and include survivor needs. Then choose the claim date that protects lifetime income, not just the largest monthly check.

About Self Employed's Editorial Process

The Self Employed editorial policy is led by editor-in-chief, Renee Johnson. We take great pride in the quality of our content. Our writers create original, accurate, engaging content that is free of ethical concerns or conflicts. Our rigorous editorial process includes editing for accuracy, recency, and clarity.

Emily is a news contributor and writer for SelfEmployed. She writes on what's going on in the business world and tips for how to get ahead.